Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry R. Heather

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 07:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Larry R. Heather[edit]

Has lost a few elections and made some ludicrous statements, but does not appear to pass guideline for inclusion of humans.
brenneman ^{L} 04:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, or barring that merge. Heather's past makes for an interesting bio, and I believe his status as a perennial candidate makes him sufficiently notable (he also holds an executive position in a provincial party of some note, in any case). I originally had this on the CHP 2006 list page, but decided there was enough material for a credible bio. CJCurrie 04:46, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. --Ardenn 05:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Multiple newspaper references, ran against prime minister in his riding, and hosts a radio show. Good enough in the notability department as far as I'm concerned. Fagstein 06:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment you meant premier... Ralph Klein :: Colin Keigher 09:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I meant prime minister Stephen Harper, though he wasn't prime minister at the time, I suppose. Fagstein 18:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, 105 google results against a living person == utterly unimportant. Quatloo 09:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A merge would also be acceptable, but it seems like there's enough information for an entire article devoted just to this one candidate. He is notable as a perennial candiate and as an activist. NoIdeaNick 09:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - My POV may wish he weren't exposed, but he is and he appears to have some importance. Captainktainer 16:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep sort of notable Funky Monkey (talk) 19:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per nom and Quatloo. RexNL 19:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 22:03, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above. Wstaffor 23:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep per Captaintainer. The guy's a yahoo, but if we can have articles for other such gadflies and annoyances who seem to attract undeserved media attention (like Fred Phelps)... Pat Payne 21:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per fine arguments above. Samaritan 07:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.