Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Johnson (bioethics activist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Single keep argument is highly unconvincing. lifebaka++ 18:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Larry Johnson (bioethics activist)[edit]
- Larry Johnson (bioethics activist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article very likely created by user with a conflict of interest (creating editor is an SPA devoted to pushing the belief that Ted Williams' remains have been mishandled). References provided do mention this person, but do not actually substantiate any of the material in the article, and once that's removed no claim of notability exists. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 16:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even if everything claimed in the article is true, Mr. Johnson would still be only notable for one thing and the article would still be a coatrack. The material should be covered in Ted Williams. Northwestgnome (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - House of Scandal (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have it on very good intelligence that this particular activist’s name will be mention quite often after the first of the year, as he is currently stirring up politicians to back his cause. It would be nice if Wikipedia was proactive and had a little background information on their site about this individual. Delete if you want, but I think it’s a bad idea. Just my two cents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.16.238 (talk) 13:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:NOTCRYSTAL on the merits of keeping him because his name will be mentioned quite often in the future. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 16:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.