Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Largest high school gyms in the United States

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:37, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Largest high school gyms in the United States[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am a firm believer of rescuing articles, but I believe that this is a biased article that was only created for Indiana schools, under the guise of United States schools. I also don't see any use for this article. This article also doesn't have any sources that would give information on any other state articles. I just can't see it working out as a page. I even considered moving it to an Indiana title, but even then it doesn't include any other states and isn't inclusive of a wide area. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The USA Today article that is the main source here expressly states that "Indiana is home to nine of the USA's 10 largest high school gyms" -- which is a fascinating fact -- and lists the top 10. Few sources are more authoritative on high school sports than USA Today. Hence the article is reliably sourced and covers a notable topic. On a side note, it's possible that this AfD hasn't been completely formed, since there seems to be no notice of the AfD on the article page. --Arxiloxos (talk) 07:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since this nom still appeared to be malformed, I've tried to fix it by adding a notice to the article and also adding this to the list at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 December 3.--Arxiloxos (talk) 17:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Needs more references to conform with WP:V, however, this topic is encyclopedic. Location (talk) 09:57, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, appears to have more than one reliable source available so someone must care about it. Polarpanda (talk) 19:18, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have absolutely no idea how this is biased toward Indiana. It is a perfectly legitimate topic, and it just happens that Indiana has the largest gyms. Reywas92 ^Talk 01:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't see any compelling reason to delete this article. Not crossing any neutrality. Deganveranx (talk) 01:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - no reason to delete but I should like to see significantly more prose to put this list in context. TerriersFan (talk) 01:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.