Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larah Claire Sabroso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to May Isang Pangarap. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 20:46, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Larah Claire Sabroso[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is in an awful state already and a quick Google search comes up with some viable results (but fails WP:ENT). This is why I'm not marking this for speedy deletion. Insulam Simia (talk) 12:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been cleaned up, but still fails to be notable. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 15:34, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:44, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to May Isang Pangarap, although I have found some brief mentions of the subject of this article from reliable sources in the Philippines none of those RSs appear to give the subject in-depth significant coverage for the subject to be considered notable as defined by WP:ANYBIO; now it be argued that she has a significant role in one television program in the Philippines, but I am unsure if she has had multiple significant roles as required to be notable as defined by WP:NACTOR. Therefore, it is my present opinion that it is too soon for the subject to have a stand alone biography article. Therefore, as the individual has only had a major role in one program May Isang Pangarap, I am presently supporting a redirect. If the subject of this AfD has a significant role in another television series, the article can be resurrected from the redirect.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above without prejudice for recreating once notability is established. Unfortunately, she hasn't had enough major roles to pass WP:NACTOR. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:GNG, and strongly oppose redirect to any article. Redirecting to a TV show may be plausible if she's a contestant in a reality show but she's an actress playing a part in a scripted show so it's wrong to do that. –H T D 11:23, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 16:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it appears to fail WP:GNG. The strongly oppose redirect to any article to any article is interesting. It does appear to be used much too frequently and to no particular advantage. --Stormbay (talk) 22:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to May Isang Pangarap, where her work can be be sourced. Young actress. Short career. TOO SOON for a separate article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:24, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.