Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lara Americo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lara Americo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a musician and activist, with no strong reliable sourcing to properly support notability for either endeavour: there are just two references here, of which one is a WP:ROUTINE piece of local coverage in her own hometown and the other is her own self-published Bandcamp page for her album. As always, neither musicians nor activists are automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- they need to be sourceable over WP:GNG, but just one media source isn't enough to get her there. Bearcat (talk) 01:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update: creator has since added several more sources, but none of them bolster notability at all. Some are unreliable sources (YouTube videos, "Shutter16", etc.), some are primary sources that she wrote herself, and some are Q&A interviews where she's giving soundbite on a topic other than herself and thus fails to be the subject of the source in question. None of this helps at all. Bearcat (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The references given do not show notability . They are either to her own postings, or PR, or mere notices. DGG ( talk ) 08:32, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.