Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lapworth House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus appears to be that there is no real evidence that this particular building is in any way notable. ~ mazca ^talk 23:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lapworth House[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This ex-residential block isn't notable. ♦ Tentinator ♦ 11:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Run of the mill former building of no encyclopedic interest.--Charles (talk) 20:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a council housing tower block, little different from many others. It might he possible to rename and repurpose this inot an article on the St Lukes estate, Birmingham. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.