Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lana Lokteff (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Lokteff[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-article on a non-notable "political activist", supported by non-significant coverage. Calton | Talk 16:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:GNG. Non-noteable radio personality. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 17:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete none of the sources come even close to showing notability. Some of them are cases that have been critiqued as trying to make people appear notable and influential who have much less following than some have tried to suggest.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.