Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamudi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lamudi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable online business. NO independent sources: only press-releases. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Needs editing, however standard searches show enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to suggest notability. See Die Welt(Germany) article, Al Bawaba article, TechCrunch article and Tech in Asia article for starters. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 16:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably Keep - if nothing else the controversies section has some independent coverage - notoriety is notability...

That said, cleanup's going to be a nuisance. Pinkbeast (talk) 19:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:36, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.