Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lalo Encinas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:54, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Lalo Encinas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Lalo Encinas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. The uncredited roles outnumber the credited ones. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Arizona. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

• Comment I improved ref3 so anyone can read it without a Newspapers.com account. That ref is probably the most in-depth coverage. Searching does find plenty of hits, but they I didn't see anything more substantial - mostly just listing his name as appearing in a film, or in a list of "Native-American" actors. MB 01:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
• Delete I think this article violates "no original reasearch" rules. We source that statement on his Apacheness to a source over 100 years old, and then say this is contradicted by census records based on no source, but I am guessing the person who wrote that may have looked at the census records. Wikipedia editors should not be trying to directly parse meaning out of census records and other primary documents, they should be building articles on statements by reputable scholars. If we lack those, as we do here, we should not have an article, period.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

• Keep. Has some sources including the newspapers clip. There might be more sources out there. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 02:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 19:13, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

• Comment I really was hoping there would be some sourcing for him, but I can't find much beyond cast lists. Doesn't appear notable. This brief mention in LOC newspapers database [1] Oaktree b (talk) 23:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.