The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete as patent nonsense. Turnstep 03:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as patent (medicine) nonsense. The claims aren't exactly verified, either.Colonel Tom 01:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. All claims are nonsense. A "gylaloscope" does not exist, Thomas Jones Asquire did not discover Meitnerium, and there is no "lalaba". — TheKMantalk 02:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
