Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Lobake National Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:46, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Lobake National Park[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nom. Incompletely nominated by IP with rationale of "I think this is the same as Parc national de Lobeke or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobeke_Lob%C3%A9k%C3%A9_National_Park and Lobake is a typo." Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the incorrect procedure. If I'm not mistaken you don't want to delete the articles, you have just idientified a duplicate article that's all. A simple redirect will suffice into one article which I've done and will begin expansion on it tomorrow. Unless of course you think a national park truly not notable? Dr. Blofeld 21:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Dr Blofeld, just merge 'em. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:03, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting is already done, so I suppose somebody can close this Yoenit (talk) 22:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.