Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lagerwey Wind

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lagerwey Wind[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability for organizations, as there is no evidence of significant coverage of the company in secondary sources. Delta13C (talk) 14:52, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I'm of course not Dutch but my searches so far have found nothing convincingly better thus delete considering there's also nothing immediately convincing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 19:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's nothing better to add to this article and there's only one reference. This doesn't meet the notability guidelines in my opinion for companies! st170e^talk 14:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 14:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. st170e^talk 14:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.