Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lag breach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Lag breach

This article is senseless — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njaard (talk • contribs) 2006-03-02 20:38:07

• Support I don't even know what this is about! njaard 04:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Only two Google hits. Not notable, whatever it is.Wickethewok 04:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unfortunately I understand it. NN gaming neologism. Draeco 05:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, impossible to understand and unencyclopedic Eivind 05:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as gobbledygook. dbtfz^talk 05:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism, fancruft, you name it. Royboycrashfan 05:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: If it were a better-known term, it'd be a plausible candidate for redirection to Race hazard, 'cos that's basically what the article describes. As it is though, I can't see anybody using it. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 05:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete gamecruft. I feel the author's pain, but it's not encyclopedic. -ikkyu2 (talk) 07:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Ikkyu2. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 09:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• I would have tried to speedy delete it as patent nonsense. Grandmasterka 10:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nonsense. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-03 13:45Z

• Strong delete speedy delete would suit fine. --Francisco Valverde 20:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- it makes sense if you concentrate long enough, but it's gamecruft, unlikely to make a useful article. Haikupoet 01:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, useless gamecruft. -- Mithent 00:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.