Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laci Scott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Oklahoma USA. Redirect is always preferred over deletion and consensus is to redirect the non-notables so closing as such (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 23:04, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Laci Scott[edit]

Laci Scott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Scott is just not notable. She was Miss Oklahoma USA. Winning a state level Miss USA competition is not enough to make someone notable. The sources are no where near enough to pass GNG. John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:50, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:08, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Miss Oklahoma USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America1000 17:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 22:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.