Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La fedeltà premiata (Antal Doráti recording)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 21:54, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La fedeltà premiata (Antal Doráti recording)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all of the criteria of WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings. -- Softlavender (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:50, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete. note that it also fails WP:NALBUM and WP:COPYVIO. The main bulk of the article consists of long paraphrases of critics reviews - these are certainly violations of copyright.Smerus (talk) 07:00, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines#Notability of recordings is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently being considered for removal for WP:NPOV concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at WP:NALBUM.4meter4 (talk) 01:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per criteria 1 at WP:NALBUM. In searching I found published reviews in New York magazine, and discussion of this work as part of an important recording legacy of Haydn works in The New York Times. The work was also critically reviewed or used as a comparison against other recordings in other critical commentary in several other NYT articles over several years, including: [1], [2], [3], and [4]. Offline I located a review in Opera, volume 27, page 1029, 1976. The work also has an entry in the reference work The Penguin Guide to Compact Discs, Ivan March, Edward Greenfield, Robert Layton, Penguin, 2001, page 622. If other publish reference works contain articles on this album, wikipedia should too.4meter4 (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issue has now been addressed - brief quotes from reviews will be supplied in due course. Part of the pioneering Dorati Haydn cycle, this album is of fundamental importance to the history of Haydn on record. See Opera, November 1976, p. 1029 for further discussion.Niggle1892 (talk) 01:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, oh my goodness! isn't it great that wikipedia has diligent editors such as 4meter4 who has shown in their above comments that this meets WP:NALBUM and is deserving of an article. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.