Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Petite Mort (James album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

La Petite Mort (James album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is too soon. The album hasn't been released. JacobiJonesJr (talk) 04:26, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. And even if it had been released it should meet Wikipedia:Notability (music albums). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An album does not have to have been released in order to merit an article: "generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label." To propose deletion of the article on such grounds only four days prior to its release seems odd to me. However, I would certainly accept that, as it stands, the article requires more reliable sources. Longwayround (talk) 11:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as per Longwayround. Eustachiusz (talk) 13:09, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've expanded the article, added several more sources and expect to add links to more reviews on Saturday or Sunday (when the printed media tends to publish its album reviews). Longwayround (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Longwayround's additions to the article; there's enough existing coverage to warrant a standalone article. Gongshow talk 23:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Nominating an article because it 'hasn't been released' when it's released a few days after the AfD starts doesn't make a lot of sense. There are already more than adequate sources available and it will obviously receive further coverage. --Michig (talk) 06:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Upon a source review, meets WP:NALBUMS/WP:GNG. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:00, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've added some reviews and links to show notability - and I'm sure that there will be a lot more good reviews to come too - and James fans mostly seem to like it too - check out the reviews on Amazon.PaukiPKK (talk) 11:23, 4 June 2014 (UTC)PaukiPKK[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.