Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Capilla del Hombre
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jujutacular talk 13:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
La Capilla del Hombre[edit]
- La Capilla del Hombre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable art gallery. This articles only sources consist of official web sites and travel guides. Neither of which make the subject notable. Unfortunately, I was not able to find additional sources, as much of the content is in a language I do not read. Akerans (talk) 23:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The New York Times quotes Frommer: "this impressive structure is in many ways the culmination of the work and dreams of Ecuador's great modern artist, Oswaldo Guayasamín"[1] It was "declared by UNESCO has (sic) a priority project for world culture and heritage for Ecuador."[2] There are 241,000 Google results,[3] 240 Google Books results,[4] and 47 Google Scholar results.[5] Ty 05:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the valid references and the NY Times...Modernist (talk) 11:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep thanks to the good research by Tyrenius. Can you add some of it to the article, particularly the UNESCO connection? --MelanieN (talk) 01:37, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.