Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaFayette Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LaFayette Center[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable failed mall. Stonemason89 (talk) 22:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I can see perhaps why it was nominated, but I searched and discovered that the mall used to be called LaFayette Place and much additional sourcing is available under that name that demonstrates notability. Looks like a well-followed sordid history of a bad development. E.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. I'd like to take a shot at expanding the article and hope it is kept.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 17:57, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources found by Milowent which establish notability quite well.--Oakshade (talk) 00:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep only if the article can be developed more. Housewatcher (talk) 01:57, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Milowent (talk · contribs). --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The provided sources establish notability Rirunmot (talk) 22:19, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.