Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LUMS Rugby Football Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LUMS Rugby Football Club[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 09:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:20, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - while there are a couple of news sources mentioning it, LUMS' team only makes up a couple of lines, and wouldn't satisfy the appropriate NSPORTS requirements either. I'd redirect, but there isn't actually anything really relevant in the university's page. A merge wouldn't be insane, but I don't think there's anything in it to make it particularly worthwhile. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I came to the same conclusion as Nosebagbear. I didn't find anything to support a claim this rugby team is notable or that it has the significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG. I thought about a redirect to the school's WP article, but there isn't a section about athletics or non-academic activities and there's not enough info about this team to warrant its own section. The team exists but doesn't meet any WP notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 01:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.