Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LIst of digivice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tyrenius 18:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LIst of digivice[edit]

WP is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Deville (Talk) 20:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, I think the extra cap in the title is unintentional. (?) --- Deville (Talk) 20:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as particularly senseless list (even though this sort of cruft gets added faster than AfD could ever remove it). Leibniz 20:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unnecessary duplication of digivice. Punkmorten 21:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with digivice. Kappa 04:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Xiange 11:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SPEEDY delete per typo in the name. Item should be redirected per duplicated content, but this is not a viable page name. No merge necessary. --Kunzite 01:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's an unnecessary direct copy of digivice! Nuff said. T.K. ^TALK 12:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.