Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LIFX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Consensus is clearly keep--Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LIFX[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:NCORP. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it does. It's my first article creation, but I checked on notability before writing about it. WP:NCORP says "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Just look at the references in the article, they're all significant and in reliable secondary sources. WesterlyRider (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep LIFX is quite notable; there are dozens of independent sources with considerable coverage. --CyberXRef^talk 18:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include [1], [2], [3]. See also: WP:BEFORE, section D. Thanks. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.