Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LA to the Moon Tour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lust for Life (Lana Del Rey album)#Tour as a compromise between keeping and deleting. (non-admin closure) J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 20:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LA to the Moon Tour[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed without explanation. Not a notable tour (per NTOUR), which is understandable since it hasn't happened yet. The coverage is purely standard, consisting of little more than "She's going on tour" followed by a list of dates. Needless to say, the article doesn't pass the GNG either. Drmies (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 18:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have an argument? One that addresses NTOUR? Drmies (talk) 01:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Lust for Life (Lana Del Rey album)#Tour for now. To warrant a standalone article, WP:NTOUR encourages coverage relating to "artistic approach, financial success, relationship to audience". Such coverage will likely exist in a couple months once the tour begins, but in the meantime, existing sources merely establish that a tour is going to happen, which the guideline says is "not sufficient to demonstrate notability." gongshow talk 08:27, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:NTOUR with significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 02:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Akhiljaxxn, please show us just one single in-depth discussion of the tour. The best source is this announcement--maybe a half a dozen sentences, none of them discussing the tour in any substantive manner. Drmies (talk) 00:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.