Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LA Podcasters

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 16:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LA Podcasters[edit]

LA Podcasters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable podcasting club/organization Gaijin42 (talk) 18:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  19:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  19:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  19:30, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now as there's not much better aside from searches with adding "Lance Anderson" some links at Books and Highbeam. SwisterTwister talk 03:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • KEEP Part of the original podcasting community. Why remove so many pages of our podcasting history? This show was one of the first and some of the best content from that time period, it's a classic program, before major media jumped in and killed the small podcasters. I think it was in the 10 itunes podcast and featured in Podcast Pickle. JBignell (talk) 18:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - if it was so relevant, where are the sources? Nothing I could find in the search engines shows it passes WP:GNG. SwisterTwister's analysis is spot on. Onel5969 TT me 13:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.