Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Brown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:05, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

L. Brown[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Not even his first name is known. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep There are alot of nominations for deletions for articles on rugby league footballers where there first name isn't known, I think they should all be nominated in the same AfD. ビッグツリ64 (talk) 21:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC) Block evasion Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the rationale for this keep vote. Are you saying that they are all the same and equally worthy of deletion? But you vote keep simply because nominated separately? Doesn't strike me as a valid reason to keep. Cbl62 (talk) 14:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:RL/N and WP:GNG. One liners with one (not reliable) reference do not render notability. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As far as I can see totally fails GNG. Subject does get a few very routine mentions in match reports, (and some of these are for second grade (and there are many browns to separate)) but nothing anywhere near in-depth. Aoziwe (talk) 11:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and also based on search results presented by Aoziwe. Cbl62 (talk) 14:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.