Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L.N.F. PRODUCTIONS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 04:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
L.N.F. PRODUCTIONS[edit]
LNF productions: no records, 1 myspace page, and a whole lot of edits promoting their artists, all non-notable Sukiari 05:25, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. All Google hits are self-referential or Wikilinks. Definitely not-notable per WP:MUSIC. --Kinu 05:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ardenn 07:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Prodego talk 15:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if they were at all notable, they would be using WP and MySpace as their main promotional sites. Get these Wiki-abusers off! Camillus (talk) 15:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable company. — TheKMantalk 19:13, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per all of the above. Bad ideas 05:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Advertisement. As Camillus said, if it had any notibility, it wouldn't be using MySpace and Wikipedia as main methods of promotion. --Wingsandsword 09:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The creator of this article tried to blank this page, which I reverted. Posting here because I forgot to write it in the edit summary. This is the second time this page has been blanked. My vote remains unchanged. Bad ideas 05:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.