Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Afrique en morceaux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

L'Afrique en morceaux[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable film, failing WP:NFILM prod removed by creator, one of several films all from the same festival created by this same editor. Most nominated (excepting those winning several awards given then benefit of the doubt) Gaijin42 (talk) 17:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep within minutes, I was able add two WP:RS: an interview with the director about the project by ARTE France, and a feature story by the Afrik.com news site. The nominator has complained that the mass creation of these articles is disruptive; I would argue that a mass deletion with little effort to find reliable sources would be more of a problem. (If this string of nominations continues, and if it can be shown that the nominator is failing to make a good faith effort to find reliable sources in a number of these cases, then I'd say the nominator is in violation of WP:POINT. But those are IFs, I'm not saying that's the case now). Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per being covered in multiple, easily found sources [1] showing this topic as notaility. I echo Shawn's concern toward the nominator's multiple and boilerplated AFDs. We do not disrupt Wikiedia to make a point. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Enough references and notability to meet WP:GNG. First Light (talk) 20:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.