Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwiklook
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Kwiklook[edit]
- Kwiklook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This package does not meet the requirements of WP:PRODUCT. The company itself is not notable enough for its own article either considering the lack of any mention on Google News and that it relies on a .biz website for advertising itself; in fact, I note that an article for FutureIT has previously been deleted as a promotional article created by the same user. Ash (talk) 12:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.