Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwenchy Kup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.-Wafulz (talk) 20:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kwenchy Kup[edit]

Cannot find any mention on this with a search, except some in passing references. Probably not important enough for wikipedia RT | Talk 15:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not appear to be notable. Unreferenced and poorly written article does not say who made the product, what countries it was sold in or what period it spanned. This makes it hard to verify. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 17:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep. With a great deal of work that is. The article is poorly written and conceived but I reckon with a fair amount of research plenty of references could be found. It is rather iconic of 90's schoolchild culture in the UK, though admittedly any references will probably be in passing. Anneonimous (talk) 23:13, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of reliable sources and demonstration of notability. Google yields a bare dozen or so references, all of which are blogs, MySpace pages, etc. Simply because a product existed does not necessarily mean that it is notable. --MCB (talk) 06:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no references from Reliable Sources, non-notable NBeale (talk) 07:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.