Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwaku Gyasi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kwaku Gyasi[edit]

Kwaku Gyasi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musician. Clams to have been nominated for an award. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO Ceethekreator (talk) 12:09, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The "keep" !votes really are very weak: "needs improvement and more citations", "only brings up links to primary sources", "deserves to be included". For this article to be kept, what is needed are reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Despite the numerical majority of "keep" !votes, at this point the "delete" !votes have the stronger policy-based reasoning.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As explained above by those who voted to keep. The musician in question is a household name and deserves to be on Wikipedia according to our notability standards. The article uses at least two credible sources that are independent on the subject hence deserves to be kept. The two most important sources myjoyonline and peacefmonline which are like Ghana's BBC and Fox news respectively. --Flixtey (talk) 12:53, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.