Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kutmusic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:46, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kutmusic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was deleted in 2009 (see User_talk:Djbatman#Proposed deletion of Kutmusic, and so far in 2010, I have yet to find any significant coverage of this label. There are no reliable sources listed, and the third reference listed doesn't mention the label whatsoever. ArcAngel (talk) ) 19:51, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- ArcAngel (talk) ) 19:52, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Another record label with no coverage to of it's own indicate notability. Codf1977 (talk) 20:32, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No/few reliable sources. Possible conflict of interest. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:12, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.