Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kusume Rumal 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kusume Rumal 2[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not cite any sources. Binod Basnet (talk) 07:59, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sources do exist, including in English two articles in the Himalayan Times, one made during filming [1], and one a review after release [2]. Whether the film meets the notability guidelines for films is another question, and would probably need reference to non-English language sources. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sequel of Kusume Rumal and here are few reliable sources which shows the notability [3] and awarded here. [4] Azkord (talk) 08:28, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:11, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 15:11, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as The Himalyan Times review and News of Nepal and other reviews so passes criteria1 of WP:NFILM and deserves to be included and improved, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.