Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunal Sehrawat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:38, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kunal Sehrawat[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't qualify WP:NPOL or WP:BASIC. XYZ leaders congratulated. Promo articles. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non notable politician. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:01, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No prominent source available to confirm notability. Thanks. --C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 14:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete student organization leaders do not default pass any inclusion criteria and the sourcing is not enough to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Non notable polotician. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. President of a state-level chapter of a political party's youth wing is not an "inherently" notable role that guarantees inclusion in Wikipedia, but the article is not sufficiently well-sourced to claim that he would pass WP:GNG in lieu of having to hold a notable political office: the sources are all either extremely short blurbs or glancing namechecks of Kunal Sehrawat's existence in coverage that isn't about him, which is not the kind of sourcing it takes to make a person notable. Bearcat (talk) 12:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.