Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunal Jaisingh (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:BLP and WP:V require that an article's contents must be verifiable to readers through sources that are actually cited in the article, not just by sources that exist somewhere. The current content remains basically unsourced even after three weeks of AfD. This mandates deletion at this time. Because the discussion indicates that the person is likely notable, the article can be recreated by anybody if they cite proper sources. Sandstein 10:11, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kunal Jaisingh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poor source and WP:BLP fail. WP:GNG not pass. Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 12:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Is notable enough to have several news articles written about him and several links to notable shows. However article does not include any sources to substantiate most of the information provided. If sources are found for the information it is a keep. Araratic | talk 11:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

comment - given he has a substantial role in two notable TV shows, probably passes WP:NACTOR #1. Sources are probably in languages of non-latin characters, so it will be difficult for me to find them. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NACTOR as he has substantial roles in two TV shows and passes WP:GNG too as several mainstream newspapers and news agencies have articles on him. Two articles by Indo-Asian News Service syndicated in Times of India [1] [2], two others by Times of India [3] [4], an article each in Indian Express [5], India Today [6] and news agency United News of India [7]. Most of the coverage seems to be fluff pieces, but he's been widely covered. —Gazoth (talk) 15:51, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gazoth: So why don't you put the reliable sources on this article? Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 16:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite off-topic for a deletion discussion isn't it? The short answer is, I'd rather work on something else. —Gazoth (talk) 17:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.