Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuala Mount Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kuala Mount Park[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from its stylistic faults, the article seems to have no basis in reality, perhaps a joke page? Jeremy Malcolm (talk) 14:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - After several source and general internet searches, not finding any information to even verify that this supposed park exists. Seems to be a WP:HOAX. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I did find a few hits for a "Kuala Mount Park" but it appears to not be the one mentioned here. Absolutely zilch relevant results, so it's most probably a hoax. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:15, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unsourced, and unsourceable. Modern day theme parks should not be invisible to a web search, yet this one appears to have managed to esacape all notice. Especially given the claims about the rollercoasters, and the large group of coaster fanatics that travel the world to ride them, it's just not credible that this place exists without any visible web presence. -- Whpq (talk) 15:36, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.