Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kruidvat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW: notable but needs improvements, sources (non-admin closure). SeanMD80talk | contribs 02:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kruidvat[edit]
Non-notable pharmacy chain. Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 13:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: It is very notable. In the Netherlands you can find one in practically every town and city. Maybe you think this because at first I messed up and said the take over cost a million and not a billion?--Him and a dog 13:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article requires cleanup, but the subject is definitely notable. AecisBrievenbus 13:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 14:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Because I agree that if the chain is ubiquitous in the Netherlands, it is notable. Because I agree with the second keep vote also. Because the nominator is a clueless Twinkle user who does no research before nominating and has no idea of the deletion criteria here. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. AecisBrievenbus 14:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for the reasons listed above; but this desperately needs sources - in English, preferably. --CastAStone//₵₳$↑₳₴₮ʘ№€ 14:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Improvement needed, but the chain of stores itself is reasonably notable. Arnoutf (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article simply needs more English sources. 131.44.121.252 (talk) 15:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC) (User:BQZip01)[reply]
- Now obvious snowball keep AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 00:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.