Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krtin Nithiyanandam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Krtin Nithiyanandam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a student at university who is not notable in any way. The number of students who have won awards at science fairs is very high, and just having won awards at school science fairs does not indicate a notable researcher making contributions to the field. The page is serving as a resume booster at the moment, and I propose its deletion. 128.12.255.132 (talk) 07:07, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article has multiple independent sources and its subject is plainly an exceptional individual whose name is very likely to be searched. I can’t see any reason at all for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 10:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep I have news articles with a simple search on four continents, including The Telegraph, The Guardian, Wired, Huff Post, Japan Times, CNN International, Time, London Express, Medical Daily, NBC, Financial Express, USAToday, La Repubblica, Scientific American, CNN Philippines, and so on. 128.12.255.132, it might be worth withdrawing the nomination. scope_creep^Talk 12:19, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - to say he "won awards at "school science fairs" is rather insulting. He has serious achievements and more media coverage than most full Chairs have. Notability extremely clearly demonstrated. Nom - could you clarify why they felt the in-article sources weren't good enough? Nosebagbear (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the extensive coverage in reliable sources as outlined above so that WP:BASIC is clearly passed Atlantic306 (talk)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:58, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Meets WP:GNG ~Kvng (talk) 13:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:RS and WP:GNG Mosaicberry (talk) 12:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - According to reliable sources he is, in fact, notable in several ways. Meets WP:GNG.JSFarman (talk) 15:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, enough snow for an early close (although with only a couple of days, suppose no need:)). Coolabahapple (talk) 15:34, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.