Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krrish Ladoiya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that this isn't notable. There wasn't an indication that this should be drafitified, although nor was there sufficient indication I should, say, salt this, to be sure. However, I will be keeping an eye to check the procedural problems don't continue. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Krrish Ladoiya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

More than 30 sources, but it seems as if there a no actual reliable, independent, significant ones among them. A badly written piece from "Timebulletin" is the only thing on Google News trying to look like a real news article, but looks to be just a fake promo piece instead. The site is blacklisted on enwiki (hence no link here), which is indicative of its value for us. Fram (talk) 10:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:06, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: a brand new editor edited the article and removed the AfD note. I have readded it. Fram (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete preferably speedily, this is a borderline hoax. It's nothing more than exaggerated vanity spam with 0 notability. CUPIDICAE💕 13:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notability and no (decent as far as I can tell) sources available at all/ Zippybonzo (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable individual. Oaktree b (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note I reverted a unilateral draftification and a blanking by one of the two primary authors. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.