Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristyn Caddell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. GedUK  12:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kristyn Caddell[edit]

Kristyn Caddell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only sources I can find about Caddell are from her employers (past and present) and news surrounding the sex scandal. I don't think that this one event is enough to make her a notable individual, and without it she's just a reporter doing her job. No significant awards or distinctions. Primefac (talk) 19:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 19:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 19:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Neither notable nor interesting.TheLongTone (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as although I found several results at Books, News, browser and highbeam, there's nothing to suggest better improvement especially with the fact this looks more like a personal and LinkedIn page. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: She had two Emmy noms, but who doesn't? —Wyliepedia 09:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.