Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristine Zedek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If and when WP:TOOSOON no longer applies, this can possibly be WP:REFUNDed. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kristine Zedek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It would appear that the subject of this article fails tests of notability WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO and so on. The references here are all passing mentions in other contexts.

Anyone can create a social media site, and I would argue that in Twitter, Instagram and Facebook links do not assist an assertion of notability. The WP:A7 tag was removed by the page creator. I have done the due diligence and can find no evidence that Ms Zedek is a notable film or television actor. As always, I am happy to be proven wrong. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 10:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:44, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (there is now ample independent sources to prov its notability including IMDB

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/chhath-rituals-bring-family-together/articleshow/61190103.cms

http://zeenews.india.com/india/the-chhath-puja-song-is-back-will-make-you-homesick-again-2051368.html
) She acted in a Tamil film Chennai 600028.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlbu9Gf-juE

--Rashkeqamar (talk) 14:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rashkeqamar: If you're going to argue that subjects are notable, you need to be familiar with what our general notability guideline says, as well as our guidelines on WP:NOTABILITY. The fact that the subject has an IMDb presence does nothing to establish notability, the video clip you added does nothing to establish notability, and the two passing mentions Zedek has in the TOI and India.com articles do nothing to establish notability. Notability means that mainstream sources have written about the subject in depth, (no, interviews don't count) or that the subject meets one of our other criteria, like WP:NACTOR. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- does not meet WP:NACTOR and WP:TOOSOON. The role in linked movie, Chennai 600028, does not appear to be major. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 14:33, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of sufficient reliable sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.