Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristin George (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Wyoming USA. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:07, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kristin George[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

George is really only known because she was Miss Wyoming USA. Her television apparences are extremly minor, and not enough for notability. We have had many discussions on this issue, and the general consensus seems to be that winners of state Miss USA competitions are not notable for such alone, and that there needs to be a strong additional reason to have the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- per WP:BIO1E and due to failing GNG. No signs of notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Wyoming USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there as the 2006 winner. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The discussion on pageant winners' notability is taking place here: RFC on creation of consensus standard, with participants variously advocating that (1) state level winners are not presumed notable, (2) state-level winners are not presumed non-notable; or (3) a special guideline is unnecessary, and that GNG should be used. There's an overlap between the these three positions. There aren't really voices for "state-level winners are always presumed notable" so I don't think the outcome of the discussion, if any, would have an impact on this AfD, which is trying to establish whether the subject meets GNG. Thus it may not make sense to suspend the AfD process for this nomination. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:40, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Wyoming USA as valid search term as stated above. -- Dane2007 ^talk 19:03, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect makes the most sense to me. People could search for her and it would be appropriate for them to go to the article on the pagent. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:14, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.