Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Hospital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Krishna Hospital[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

as per WP:NOTABILITY. WP:Unreferenced Vin09 (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 15:55, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete The Article is simply a stub and clearly is not notable at all. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and not Maps. Dormantos (talk) 12:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This newly registered account has left the very similar deletion rationales (almost every one a "strong delete") on dozens of AfDs in rapid fashion. Likely he did not read any of the articles (one he said fails "BLP" was a company, for example). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:07, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a quick look at the revision history reveals that there were previously external links that were judged (correctly) as linkspam and removed, leaving no external links nor citations. Therefore fails wp:V. BakerStMD 00:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - small hospitals are not automatically notable. Bearian (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.