Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Roglieri

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kris Roglieri[edit]

Kris Roglieri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After I stated and showed the obvious signs of this only existing as an article but then worse, actually being a paid advertisement, a random IP removed it, therefore not only will the PROD still apply, but so is policy WP:NOT which is stated explicitly to remove any such advertising and that includes paid advertising, since it is not tolerated and will be deleted onsight, as it's quite clear there's enough here to state policy is far important than anything else. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have used similar wiki pages as reference to create this article. So I dont think this is written in an advertisment manner. Moreover please point out what is in this article that looks to you as advertisment ? Godisthebestone (talk) 08:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the links come from blogs and contributors to Forbes which is a hive for Churnalism articles. --Domdeparis (talk) 09:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- an unremarkable entrepreneur with insufficient sourcing to meet GNG. The subject's business is also at AfD. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:03, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.