Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kripke Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:41, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kripke Center[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 07:47, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:09, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment : I see little more beyond primary and insignificant sources. Heart on sleeve is fine but where's the notability, for christ's sakes? -The Gnome (talk) 16:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with the parent organisation Creighton University which is notable and then redirect to the appropriate section as not independently notable, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:00, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the Saul Kripke Center at CUNY (Graduate Center, CUNY#Centers and institutes) is probably the more important Kripke Center. For this reason, I don't think a redirect to Creighton makes sense - at least this page makes it clear that it isn't associated with the logician. In my opinion, someone searching for Kripke Center shouldn't be sent to Creighton's page, but rather given a disambig or just a search results with links to both CUNY and Creighton. Smmurphy^(Talk) 15:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:52, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:49, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on account of the subject lacking verifiable notability. It even fails WP:GNG. The Washington Post article (news agency: Religion News Service) mentions the subject only once, in a context about religious boycotts of a private company in America. The Harris Center for Jewish Studies article name drops the subject once in a list of similar organizations. Exactly the same goes for the single citation in the cited book The Death of Scripture and the Rise of Biblical Studies. In the other cited book, Sensational Devotion, there is a single mention in a footnote about the journal the subject organization publishes. In so many words: We have no sources. -The Gnome (talk) 13:04, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 20:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.