Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kreston International Limited

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kreston International Limited[edit]

Kreston International Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization which falls short of WP:ORG. A before search reveals the organization being mentioned in primary sources not independent of them & other unreliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, no in-depth coverage to pass WP:NCORP. I work in the industry and never heard of them... Renata (talk) 20:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - blatant advertising; wording sounds like a membership leaflet. Deb (talk) 08:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - shamelessly promotional, no evidence of notability. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Doesn't meet any of the guidelines. Less Unless (talk) 17:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TNT. It's so poorly written that I can't tell what it is about. Bearian (talk) 20:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.