Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koya Tanio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 11:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Koya Tanio[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One source is provided but no media coverage nor notability claim provided. DrStrauss talk 13:27, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes NFOOTY, has played senior international football, in a fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. Fenix down (talk) 13:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Source listed in the article confirms he has played in a fully professional league, meaning the article meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL; needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 14:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - J3 is now fully professional. Nfitz (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - clearly passes WP:NFOOTY. Can we close this already? Smartyllama (talk) 19:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.