Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotono Shibuya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Final relist. Not eligible for a Soft Deletion. Anyone care to comment here? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kotono Shibuya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This one sentence biography article has zero references, and is not sufficient to establish notability. The Japanese Wikipedia article for the person has just one cite, insufficient to be notable. After searching, found social media, but no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of the person. Article was created on 22 January 2005 JoeNMLC (talk) 15:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
She played rather significant roles in an awful lot of dramas and in various films, so that she probably meets WP:NACTOR, but most of the films and series/TV films have no page in English (they DO have a page on Ja.WP, fwiw, if someone has the courage to link, source, translate.) GBooks allows to verify that, though. I have no time to improve it as it should now but I would not be shocked if this was kept, and might do it later if such is the path chosen.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.