Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kota Johor Lama Museum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 00:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kota Johor Lama Museum[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. No gnews hits for English, only 1 gnews hit for Malay name LibStar (talk) 23:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:55, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Several improvements have been made since being nominated, so the article should be given another look.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KeepFound a couple of government links [1], [2] Mtpos (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- Looks notable enough. Just need to add some more sources. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamJayYas (talk • contribs) 10:38, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as there are enough sources to show notabilityJackattack1597 (talk) 22:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.