Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kory Nagy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kory Nagy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 18:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 19:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 19:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Nagy does not meet NHOCKEY, and I doubt he got much coverage for his playing. But he does have some coverage for becoming an NHL official , eg., here. So this may be worth some additional research. Rlendog (talk) 16:03, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scouting the Refs is a blog, not a reliable source. Bearcat (talk) 17:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:27, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 01:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of clearing WP:NHOCKEY — a person gets over the bar for playing in the NHL, not just for being selected in the player draft but never actually getting onto the ice — and no strong evidence of reliable source coverage to clear GNG, as most of the sources here are primary ones, and the few that are real media don't add up to enough real media. Bearcat (talk) 17:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.