Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konrad Mathieu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Konrad Mathieu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. References are atrocious. Been on WP since 2011 and never been effectively references. Currently satisfies WP:V. scope_creep^Talk 11:27, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:47, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revised and hopefully improved article, re-checked facts and existence of all publications. Kombi3 (talk) 20:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the additional sources added to the article do not make a case for WP:GNG, and one of them appears to be a total red herring that doesn't mention Mathieu or his bands ([1]). _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Releasing some 30 albums over four decades does seem like a noteworthy accomplishment for a recording artist like Mathieu, at least among musicians. How does one - reference-wise - properly make a case for that? (don't bite a baby;) Kombi3 (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait - may one, before perspicacious judgment is performed, at least ask for some more time for research. There should definitely be more printed sources out there that - partly being from the pre-internet era - are a harder to retrieve 213.160.14.18 (talk) 20:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was unable to find any significant coverage in WP:LIBRARY, Google Books, archive.org, or newspapers.com. Jfire (talk) 05:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.