Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konkhra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Konkhra[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:NMUSIC. Very few hits on google. Albums do not appear to have been released on major labels or important indie labels. noq (talk) 08:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Found several reliable sources: Allmusic biography, Metal Storm, Laut.de, Sputnikmusic, Metal Inside. I have also found a Blabbermouth page, but that's just about them signing to Hammerheart Records (which is a notable label). There is also a Chronicles of Chaos interview. Also found two album reviews on Metal.de.

GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 17:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - fairly easy to find coverage from secondary sources. Nuclear Blast is an important indie label. Blackguard 06:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - What is the significance of Nuclear Blast to this article? It is not listed as one of the labels they have released on. noq (talk) 09:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Konkhra's debut album was released on Nuclear Blast. Blackguard 05:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources as shown above such as Sputnik Music, Metal Storm, AllMusic, Chronicles of Chaos and others so passes WP:GNG in my view Atlantic306 (talk) 23:58, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.